“Tell Them You Mean Business”

Boston Doctors Considering New Solutions for Brain Injury Patients

Our Boston brain injury attorneys know that trauma to the head occurs in many different situations, including slip and fall accidents and car wrecks. When a brain injury occurs, immediate treatment is often required in order to prevent life-threatening or life-changing complications from arising. A failure to get prompt treatment to relieve pressure on the brain and to restore the flow of oxygen can result in permanent cognitive impairment. 

Unfortunately, when many brain injury victims are taken to the hospital after car accidents or other incidents, these victims are unconscious and unable to give informed consent to medical treatment. Getting in touch with family members or pursuing other avenues to obtain consent to treat can be time consuming and delays can adversely impact the ability of patients to recover. To avoid these delays and allow for more prompt treatment, a group of Boston doctors is now trying to join a study allowing brain injury victims to be treated without first obtaining informed consent.

Boston Doctors Address Treatment of Brain Injury Victims

According to the Boston Globe, a group of Boston doctors is proposing joining a national trial designed to determine the impact of the hormone progesterone on a brain injury patient. The study team, which is made up of doctors from Massachusetts General Hospital and from the Boston Medical Center, want to be able to provide these progesterone injections to the patient in the hours immediately after trauma occurs that affects the brain.

Typically, patients must give informed consent before receiving any type of treatment. If a patient is unconscious or unable to give consent, then family members are usually asked to make the decision on the victim’s behalf. Trauma victims brought in after accidents, however, often come in alone with no one to give consent or speak for them.

While doctors try to get permission to provide treatment, swelling, metabolic changes and fluid build-up in the brain cause a “secondary cascade” of brain injury after the initial trauma to the head. During this “secondary cascade,” cells in the brain continue to die. This causes more and more neurological and cognitive impairment and can result in devastating lifelong disability.

There is no cure once the cells have died and the brain has been permanently damaged, but administering progesterone can help to stop this secondary cascade and can result in a reduction in severe brain injury complications and fewer deaths after a head trauma.

While it may seem obvious that doctors should be able to give patients progesterone to stop cell death, federal law and medical ethics both impose general rules that patients should be able to refuse enrollment before participating in a study and should give informed consent to do so.

The very definition of this study, however, would involve doctors giving patients treatments when they cannot consent. This raises concerns, especially if the progesterone treatment turns out to cause complications or be dangerous. The person harmed by it or the family members could potentially argue that the doctor committed medical malpractice for the failure to obtain informed consent.

If the doctors do join the national clinical trials, this will be the first exception since 1996 to the informed consent rules requiring a patient have a chance to refuse participation in a study before it begins.  However, the exception could end up being worth it if fewer people suffer severe traumatic brain injury due to accidents.

If you’ve been hurt, call 1-800-WIN-WIN-1 for a free consultation with a personal injury lawyer at the Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone.

Government Agencies Seek Ultimate Solution to Curbing Distracted Driving

Government overreach has been the big theme in just about every newspaper in recent weeks. The IRS has been caught targeting conservative groups for extra scrutiny, the EPA is in trouble for giving farmers’ information to environmentalists, and the Department of Justice was found to be secretly subpoenaing the phone records of journalists.

While people throughout the U.S. are becoming increasingly concerned about just what the government is doing - especially with electronic data - the government has made no secret of its involvement when it comes to what citizens do with electronic gadgets while behind the wheel. Our Boston car accident lawyers know the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Department of Transportation (DOT) continue to push for stricter rules to address the dangers.

Feds Aim to Find an Ultimate Solution to Distracted Driving Issues

According to Wired.com, federal regulators are hoping to make it impossible to send texts or use the Internet while driving.  The NHTSA and the DOT have a 281-page report outlining guidelines for stopping the use of electronic devices by drivers.

The plan apparently targets both car manufacturers and those in the electronics industry. New regulations within these industries could perhaps provide a technological solution or innovation that would make using a mobile device impossible while driving. For example, the “ultimate solution” to stop distracted driving could, according to the Feds, is to deactivate mobile devices when the car is being driven. A new and innovative device could be used to recognize when a driver is using a mobile device and to then deactivate the device so the user’s focus would be forced back to the road.

NHTSA lawmakers, in particular, are concerned about video functionality, texting and messaging, Internet browsing and any activity that takes the drivers focus off of the road for longer than a few seconds.

The NHTSA wants the driver to refrain from taking his eyes off of the road or hands off of the wheel for more than two seconds for each input when using an in-car or other device. They also want to ensure that it takes a total of 12 seconds or less for a driver to complete any task he would need to do in the car.

By keeping tasks short and by keeping drivers eyes on the road, there would be fewer distracted driving crashes. Texting and Internet browsing obviously take more than two seconds, so the NHTSA wants these behaviors to end behind the wheel, permanently.

Two paths are being proposed in order to put a final stop to distracted driving behaviors. One would require drivers to physically connect their phones or mobile devices to the embedded system in the cars that disable functionality while the vehicle is driving. The other is a proximity sensor in the car that recognizes when a driver is using a device and requires that the device be passed off to a passenger.

The issue of a proximity sensor in the car is, of course, likely to raise further concerns about government access to data and about the security of our private information. Could the sensor tell who was in the car, for example, or where you were going?

While concerns about government overreach are undeniably valid, some type of technical solution to put a permanent end to distracted driving might be a good way to save lives if there was a way to find a solution with the help of both car manufacturers and electronics companies.

If you’ve been hurt, call 1-800-WIN-WIN-1 for a free consultation with a personal injury lawyer at the Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone.